Cloverfield | A

director: Matt Reeves
writer: Drew Goddard
starring: Michael Stahl-David, Lizzy Caplan, Odette Yustman, Jessica Lucas, T.J. Miller

CloverfieldIf you haven’t seen this yet, stop reading now, close your browser, shut off your computer, and get to the theater to see Cloverfield. Don’t read or watch anything about it. Three pieces of advice, though: if you couldn’t handle the shaky-cam style of movies like Bourne Ultimatum, you probably won’t make it through this flick (much to your loss); watch everything in the movie carefully; and stay after the credits.

Here’s some filler text so the formatting of this post doesn’t get screwed up before the “Click here to continue reading…” link. Blabbity blah blah blah, look at how sweet nonsensical text can be. Here’s my impression of Miss South Carolina in that Youtube video in my last post: “I personally believe vacuum cleaner, dishrag, chocolate pie, catnip, PVC pipe.” A true inspiration to America. If you haven’t seen the movie and are still reading, then you’re being foolish and might also be the type of person that enjoys conversing with the aformentioned beauty queen. “Duffel bag, stove, dial-up modem.” There; that should do it. Enjoy the review.

The easiest way to describe Cloverfield as a film is Blair Witch Project meets Godzilla, which is to say it’s shot in the style of the handheld Blair Witch with the production value of the blockbuster Godzilla that came out in 2003. While I liked the former, the latter was an overhyped turd-on-arrival that had all the intelligence of Miss South Carolina (I’m really starting to feel bad for her; maybe I should give her a call and take her out). And while Cloverfield isn’t exactly a discourse on the finer points of the agrarian emphases of pre-industrial society, it manages to engage your mind with what it shows you onscreen (and just as much with what it doesn’t show you). I love the pace it starts with at Rob’s good-bye party; a bunch of unassuming partygoers getting together on what could be any regular night. When the first tremors of fear hit, the plot’s pace quickens, snowballing as the characters get caught up in new layers of the chaos that New York City’s “visitor” has wrought. It’s a rollercoaster ride once the shit hits the fan.

That escalation in tension and pace is accomplished without having to show action in the conventional blockbuster method of establishing wide shots, medium shots of our characters, and then back-and-forth dialogue. All the events are seen through the solitary lens of Hud’s camera and as such, we don’t know anymore about what’s going on than our main characters do. That makes it all the more terrifying when they do find themselves in the middle of the action–it comes without warning and without mercy. You react viscerally, just as the characters do. Those action sequences we do get are just as awe-inspiring as they’d be with a wide shot, and they’re pretty effective despite it all being on a mini-DV cam (I think of the first contact our characters have with the military and the Brooklyn Bridge sequences, in particular). The sound work has a lot to do with that as well, I think–that mini-cam has a hell of a microphone.

We are shown certain external facets of the larger picture, with scattered news reports on TV, radio chatter on the military’s walkie-talkies, and the broadcast in the helicopter after it crashes in Central Park. You never find out where the monster came from (more on that in a moment), why it’s there, or how the rest of the country is viewing the events. There could be a global attack underway, for all we know (though Rob’s cell phone conversation with his mom doesn’t give any credence to that). You do certainly get to see the beast in its entirety, in daylight, which I don’t even think was necessary. The shadowed, corner-of-the-eye glimpses of the thing disappearing around buildings, or of its massive foot crushing a tank, are all that’s needed.

It’s a ballsy move to end the movie the way it does, without a real “resolution,” but factoring in the way it’s presented–as one piece in a Department of Defense record of the “Cloverfield Incident”–it has to work that way. You can’t have a title card at the end that lays out the events of the following days, you can’t have an external scene after the credits that shows the city in ruins with a soldier finding the camera. Hell, we don’t even know why the movie’s called “Cloverfield!” It’s great, isn’t it! The story needs to stay within the confines of the camera. It’s cheating to do otherwise, and makes the end all the more haunting. The movie is able to do this because it’s got quality people making that, and I hope Hollywood takes that into account lest it try to make a cheap knock-off of this style of moviemaking. It’s not easy to pull off a movie shot on a single mini-cam and still have it be entertaining and coherent. Give credit to producer J.J. Abrams, whose track record is pretty impressive thus far (notwithstanding the terrible fate that befell Alias) for putting together a crew that knocked it out of the park.

Two final notes: the audio clip after the credits is actually being played in reverse, and when played properly says, “it’s still alive.” We don’t need a sequel, Cloverfield producers. Don’t mess this up. Second, in the final scene of the movie, a flashback to Beth and Rob’s day together, the camera pans to the ocean briefly while they’re in the ferris wheel. I missed this, but apparently you can see something large crash into the water. The audio clip may be interpreted as evidence a sequel could be in the offing, but I wouldn’t give it too much weight. As much as I’d like to see a sequel or a more conventional companion piece that shows the events of Cloverfield from a broader perspective, it’s just because the movie keeps you thinking long after the credits roll. It’s the quintessential “leave them wanting more” approach. I want more, but we don’t need more to make Cloverfield the best film of 2008 (keep in mind I’m writing this on January 19th.)

A truly final note: I’m very fond of Marlena/Lizzy Caplan. I’ll take her over Miss South Carolina (who just can’t seem to catch a break).

Updated: January 19, 2008 — 9:44 pm

11 Comments

Add a Comment
  1. Oh, and I very much want to see a movie featuring flaming hobos.

  2. Two quotes from other reviews that ring true to me:

    http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/node/35236

    I guarantee you that as this movie takes place… all the shit that you’ve seen in Giant monster movies is happening. Somewhere a general is screaming about nuking New York…. Somewhere is a politician screaming that you can’t nuke New York. Another General wants to know why our weapons are not affecting this thing. A PRESIDENT wants to know where it came from – and several thousand journalist are trying to figure all that out too.

    But this film isn’t about the scientist, the generals, the Presidents, the mayors or any of the big people. This time, the film is from the perspective of those people that live in those buildings that the monster is breaking through. This is about the people running in the street that scream, “GODZILLA!!!” and run. This is about trying to survive that insanity. Not just that, but to try and save one life.

    http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/node/35303

    At the end of the film, as the credits started I noticed a lot of people get up and leave. For the love of god, DON’T! When the music starts, you’ll thank me for that dramatic advice. The film has no score at all, the only music is the songs at the party, and unless I’m mistaken the occasional stray TV set or radio, and that does not keep up throughout. And then, at the end of the film as most people are heading back to their cars or whatever, the musical score comes to life. I closed my eyes and listened to it, and I could see the scenes and the people all over again, how the music would have played against this film, had it just been any old film. I heard Rob and Beth’s love theme, the monster’s theme, Hud’s theme, even the little monsters (who do look a bit like baby versions of the Starship Troopers bugs) had their own theme. It was really a magical 7 or so minutes of music.

  3. cloverfield = badass. I haven’t had this much fun with a film in a long time.

  4. Anyone know what the foreign guy who stopped Hud in the alley was saying?

    Cloverfield had a viral marketing campaign much like Lost does during its downtime, and I didn’t realize it had much bearing on the movie until I read the following article:
    http://www.moviemarketingmadness.com/blog/2008/01/17/movie-marketing-madness-cloverfield/

    Hints of the monster’s origins?

  5. It almost makes a nice companion piece to the Stephen King movie “The Mist”

  6. Believe it or not, I think you can get the origin of the monster here:
    http://www.slusho.jp/

  7. The Blair Witch Project in Manhattan 🙁

  8. The appearance of Manhattanzilla spoiled the thrilling suspense. I wonder when Cloverfield-2 is coming out. I expect at least two mediocre sequels.

  9. cloverfield = F-

Leave a Reply

The Wayward Cynic © 2014 Frontier Theme
%d bloggers like this: